Tag: Montgomery County PA

bookmark_borderNew Look Roofing

Posted on by admin

New Look Roofing company Roofers Please Call Today — 215-938-8484

Welcome to New Look Roofing – The Roofing Company &  Contractor

Not only does New Look Roofing have the experience, they also have the best guarantee in the business.

New Look Roofing: Built on experience, growing by reputation!

Roofing Company in Philadelphia, Philadelphia Roofer Company

Barbra Cooley, “I can’t thank you enough for your promptness and professionalism. You took care of our leak immediately and saved us from a storm that occurred the following week. Your work crew was great, and while they were doing our work, I actually referred your company to my neighbor.”

Roofing Contractors Philadelphia, Philadelphia Roofing Companies

Dave & Dolly Wilson, “We are very pleased with the service you provided to us. You took care of our roofing needs, made us aware of any problems you saw and resolved them ASAP. Again we would like to thank you and your company, and if we have the opportunity we will certainly recommend you to anyone that needs a new roof.”

one of the best Roofers in Philadelphia, Philadelphia Roofing Company, Philadelphia roofing Contractor

Ben Nead, “We met Dustin at the Home Show, we were looking for a GAF product. The reason we wanted a GAF product is because we have another home shingled with GAF shingles. I spent an hour speaking with Dustin, and decided to set up an appointment with Dustin in my home because of the information he gave to me.”

CONTACT NEW LOOK ROOFING

Full Name

 E-Mail Address

 Phone

 Property Address

Please briefly explain your project.

Please click the submit button.

Thank you.

3931 Bluebird Road * Huntington Valley, PA 19006 * Phone 215-938-8484

bookmark_borderOutlook For Montgomery County

Posted on by admin

Moody’s Investors Service late affirmed Montgomery County’s Aa1 bond rating saying that it reflected the county “management’s efforts over the past year to grow recurring revenues, control costs and improve long-term budgeting procedures.” At the same time, however, Moody’s revised the county’s outlook from stable to negative, basing that decision on what it called “the county’s narrow financial position following several years of operating deficits, including a larger than projected deficit for fiscal 2012.”

In its outlook, Moody’s said the county suffered “significant operating deficits in fiscal years 2008 through 2012, driven largely by structural imbalances that the county began to close in fiscal 2012.” It went on to explain that the new county administration employed “a variety of cost reduction measures that resulted in a more modest operating deficit in fiscal 2012 than in several prior fiscal
years.”

“We are not at all surprised by either of Moody’s actions today,” said Uri Monson, the county’s chief financial officer. “Moody’s reaffirmed our rating, because they know that we are aggressively and systematically addressing the problems we inherited, but they also know that our road has not been an easy one to traverse, and these challenges will not be solved overnight.”